On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >> Yes, but "how hard is it reasonable for the kernel to try" is based on >> both items. A good first order approximation is number of requests. > >I must strongly disagree with that claim. A request could be 512 bytes or >128K. Current elevator account the number of bh that enters the bh layer (we're not making difference between 1k and 4k softblocksizes though). I was misleading (sorry) when I used the term "request", I didn't meant a `struct request" but a new I/O request (1k/4k sized) pushed into the blkdev layer. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Chris Evans
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Martin Dalecki
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Martin Dalecki
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli