Horst von Brand wrote:
> OK, OK, OK. It is by now abundantly clear that NFSv3 is a high-priority
> item for lots of people out there. But just complaining about it not being
> in the kernel just generates ill will.
Think Alan has made that clear. The way I read things the nfsv2 stuff needs
to be split out, into sets of small independent patches. This lets Alan
audit and control any bad patches easily. The nfsv3 changes should not
effect anything unless they are selected in the kernel build.
Comments?
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
