On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > >Uhmmm, isn't the elevator about request /latency/ ? > > Yes, but definitely not absolute "time" latency. So what do you think about the idea Jeff Merkey presented? It seems to work well for Netware, so maybe we should try for Linux? regards, Rik -- "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!" -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000 http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Chris Evans
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Martin Dalecki
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Martin Dalecki
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Martin Dalecki
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Michael T. Babcock
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Giuliano Pochini
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Giuliano Pochini