On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >> That problem: the original elevator code did not schedule I/O particularly >> fairly under certain I/O usage patterns. So it got fixed. > >No it got hacked up a bit. Why do you say it's not been fixed? Can you still reproduce hangs long as a write(2) can write? I certainly can't. >Actually my brain says that elapsed time based scheduling is the right thing >to do. It certainly works for networks Going in function of time it's a few liner patch with respect to the current scheduler. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Rik van Riel
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Chris Evans
- (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Chris Evans
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland