> Going in function of time is obviously wrong. A blockdevice can write 1 > request every two seconds or 1 request every msecond. You can't assume > anything in function of time _unless_ you have per harddisk timing > informations into the kernel. Andrea - latency is time measured and perceived. Doing it time based seems to make reasonable sense. I grant you might want to play with the weighting per device, but actually keeping device based dirty list length limits based on average throughput is probably a lot more productive - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 James Sutherland
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Giuliano Pochini
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Hans Reiser
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Chris Evans
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Giuliano Pochini
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Ragnar Kjørstad
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Giuliano Pochini
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 yodaiken
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 yodaiken
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2 Alan Cox