On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: >That code example can in theory deadlock without any patches if the CPU's Woops I really meant: while (test_and_set_bit(0, &lock)); /* critical section */ mb(); clear_bit(0, &lock); Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preemption patch George Anzinger
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preempti... Andrew Morton
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preempti... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" pree... Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... George Anzinger
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock&qu... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock&qu... Ralf Baechle