Larry McVoy wrote:
> > Development:
> > In addition, by maintaining the system in CVS we can offer much
> > faster and convenient source updates than are currently available
> > from other Linux-based systems currently available.
>
> Err, "faster"? The following is the moral equiv of 4 kernel updates
> which had nothing to do using BitKeeper instead of CVS. The local copy
> was in San Francisco and the remote copy is Cort's machine in New Mexico
> over a 384Kbits/sec link. All 4 updates in 5 seconds. Anyone have a
> CVS tree they can try to get comparable numbers?
Try: http://innominate.org/~tgr/projects/lksr/
Actually rather handy.
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
