On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 04:58:33PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > Yes, I can reproduce this with gcc-2.95.2 (compiles cleanly with 2.96). > Looks like older gcc doesn't like when output operand 5 listed > also as input. Hmm. > Simple swapping operands 4 and 5 makes gcc happy. I've got a patch to rearrange this whole sets of codes into something a bit cleaner. I'll see about forwarding it shortly. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-pre[2-6] Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Compilation failure on Alpha with test8-p... Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: Compilation failure on Alpha with tes... Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Compilation failure on Alpha with... Anton Blanchard
- Re: Compilation failure on Alpha ... Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Compilation failure on Alpha ... Ivan Kokshaysky
- Re: Compilation failure on A... Richard Henderson
- Reorg raid5 block xor routines Richard Henderson
- Reorg raid5 block xor routines Richard Henderson
- Re: Reorg raid5 block xor routine... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Reorg raid5 block xor ro... Richard Henderson
- Re: Reorg raid5 block xo... Richard Henderson