On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, G. Hugh Song wrote:
>
> > if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \
> > -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \
> > -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != n ]; then
>
> n vs "n" is my error.
>
> However 'make menuconfig' works with just n. I know I should have tested
> with all types of configs but I probably felt that make oldconfig and
> menuconfig was enough. make config seems happy too.
>
> > I simply thought putting n inside an double-quoting n would solve
> > the problem. But it did not.
>
> It should and does for me when I apply the patch below. Did you do
> something else?
>
> /Urban
>
> --- linux/fs/nls/Config.in.orig Thu Sep 7 18:12:43 2000
> +++ linux/fs/nls/Config.in Thu Sep 7 18:12:56 2000
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> # msdos and Joliet want NLS
> if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \
> -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \
> - -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != n ]; then
> + -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != "n" ]; then
> define_bool CONFIG_NLS y
> else
> define_bool CONFIG_NLS n
oldconfig always ask about CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE in case it
was set CONFIG_SMB_NLS_REMOTE="" in the previous config.
This is expected?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
