In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Linus writes ... > mec> (2) Make the architecture a configuration variable (!) > linus> Why? > The real reason is that it's the right thing to do. Part of a > configuration is "what machine it's for". > Here are some benefits: > (a) Arjan's testing machinery would catch problems in all architectures, > not just the x86. This is technically not true. I can cross-compile with my tools just fine, it "just" requires a decent cross-compiler on my system[1] [2]. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven [1] I do have a 18Gb disk available for it [2] Or someone should get me access on a <put favorite non-i386 arch here> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abo... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is qu... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Pavel Machek
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abo... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abo... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / Ke... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Horst von Brand
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Adrian Cox
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abo... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Peter Samuelson
- support for 2 Promise 66 Ultra car... Aryeh \"Cody\" Sherr
- Re: support for 2 Promise 66 U... Jeff Nguyen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abo... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Keith Owens