On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Martin MaD Douda wrote: > Problem: every bloody line will go through the parser. There is too many > lines. Compilation is realy slow today. I'm affraid this approach would > make it worse. Note that 2.4.0-test7 has more than 2.75 milion lines. > Or did you mean drivers will be (optionally?) excluded from this > compile-it-all-and-then-optimize-it-away? Do you always compile all *.c files? Notice that it doesn't equate to ifdefs - e.g. if you have CONFIG_EXT2 undefined ext2 will not be compiled at all, but there is no instance of CONFIG_EXT2 anywhere in *.[ch]. As for reducing compile time, try to feed the current tree through cpp and see how much is included (and ignored) by preprocessor. I mean, just check how much do we actually include and how little do we really need... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite b... David Woodhouse
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite b... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Nix
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad /... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite b... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite b... Linus Torvalds
- if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Martin MaD Douda
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is ... Alexander Viro
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is ... Russell King
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integr... Peter Rival
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Mark H. Wood
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro