On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > - VIA ide driver update (well, rewrite - the old one was buggy and broken)
>
> Can someone explain this line from the VIA update?
> #define FIT(v,min,max) (((v)>(max)?(max):(v))<(min)?(min):(v))
> Barring side effects on the variables, it is equivalent to
> #define FIT(v,min,max) ((v)<(min)?(min):(v))
>
> Why do I get the feeling that this was *not* the intent?
Correct. The last v should be replaced with whatever that we got from
(v)>(max)?(max):(v), like:
#define FIT(v,min,max) (((v)>(max)?(max):(v))<(min)?(min):((v)>(max)?(max):(v)))
Or perhaps this is a lot better:
#define FIT(v,min,max) ((v)>(max)?(max):((v)<(min)?(min):(v)))
Dan Aloni (dax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
