Alan Cox wrote: > > Alan, can you send me again the list of CPUs you think > > is worth using 486 string routines. > > Sorry, i lost your previous mail. > > I suspect it is > > 486 > K5 > IDT Winchip > Rise > NexGen Take a look at http://now.cs.berkeley.edu/Td/bcopy.html Speed increases by 50% for unrolled string copies on their P5s. Sure they're old, but so are 486s :-) Of course you do _not_ want to inline a long string copy routine. There should probably be a arch/i386/lib/string-486.c. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modified Pavel Machek
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov
- Re: [patch] string-486.h modi... Petko Manolov