Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Andre Hedrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> This it will have to wait for 2.5, but everyone needs to get off the issue
> that it is a filter and understand that it is a command completion
> pre-handler. I hope that you finally understand the point and we do not
> have to fight again, next will be to take LT to school about the issue.
>
> I hope by that time I will have a newer model that will force the enduser
> to do the entire setup with a task-struct that includes a table for
> setting up table io rules. Then everyone will have to read the 404 page
> doc to understand how to apply the taskfile. In short if you can not
> setup the taskfile in user-space and define the needed return, you have no
> business calling the IOCTL; however, I will allow all BAD-ROOTS to ram
> shit down the pipes and only certify programs that are known to do things
> correctly. This will allow OEMs to keep their secrets and remove Linux
> from needed to know or allow binary modules to load in the driver that are
> not native.
>
This sounds excellent!
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
