Hi.
I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per Tigran
Aivazian's suggestion). This impacts hfs as per the following
patch.
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hfs/file.c
linux/fs/hfs/file.c
--- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/hfs/file.c Sun Feb 27 05:33:42 2000
+++ linux/fs/hfs/file.c Mon Sep 4 20:43:20 2000
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@
written += c;
buf += c;
mark_buffer_uptodate(bh, 1);
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
brelse(bh);
}
if (written > 0) {
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h
linux/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h
--- linux-240test8-pre2/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h Mon Jul 31 21:05:03 2000
+++ linux/include/linux/hfs_sysdep.h Mon Sep 4 21:21:12 2000
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
}
extern inline void hfs_buffer_dirty(hfs_buffer buffer) {
- mark_buffer_dirty(buffer, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(buffer);
}
extern inline void hfs_buffer_sync(hfs_buffer buffer) {
--
Regards,
Rasmus([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the
public mind. -General William Westmoreland, during the war in Viet Nam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
