Hi.
I have changed the interface to mark_buffer_dirty (as per your
suggestion to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo). This impacts bfs as per
the following patch.
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.c
linux/fs/bfs/dir.c
--- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/dir.c Thu Aug 24 09:43:34 2000
+++ linux/fs/bfs/dir.c Mon Sep 4 20:46:23 2000
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
}
de->ino = 0;
dir->i_version = ++event;
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
dir->i_ctime = dir->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
mark_inode_dirty(dir);
inode->i_nlink--;
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
new_inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
mark_inode_dirty(new_inode);
}
- mark_buffer_dirty(old_bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(old_bh);
error = 0;
end_rename:
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
de->ino = ino;
for (i=0; i<BFS_NAMELEN; i++)
de->name[i] = (i < namelen) ? name[i] : 0;
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
brelse(bh);
return 0;
}
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/file.c
linux/fs/bfs/file.c
--- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/file.c Mon May 8 22:51:01 2000
+++ linux/fs/bfs/file.c Mon Sep 4 20:46:32 2000
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
return -EIO;
new = getblk(dev, to, BFS_BSIZE);
memcpy(new->b_data, bh->b_data, bh->b_size);
- mark_buffer_dirty(new, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(new);
bforget(bh);
brelse(new);
return 0;
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
bh_result->b_state |= (1UL << BH_Mapped);
s->su_lf_eblk = inode->iu_eblock = inode->iu_sblock + block;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
- mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh);
err = 0;
goto out;
}
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
inode->iu_sblock = next_free_block;
s->su_lf_eblk = inode->iu_eblock = next_free_block + block;
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
- mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh);
bh_result->b_dev = inode->i_dev;
bh_result->b_blocknr = inode->iu_sblock + block;
bh_result->b_state |= (1UL << BH_Mapped);
diff -u --recursive -X misc/dontdiff linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/inode.c
linux/fs/bfs/inode.c
--- linux-240test8-pre2/fs/bfs/inode.c Mon Jul 31 21:04:05 2000
+++ linux/fs/bfs/inode.c Mon Sep 4 20:46:46 2000
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
di->i_eblock = inode->iu_eblock;
di->i_eoffset = di->i_sblock * BFS_BSIZE + inode->i_size - 1;
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
brelse(bh);
unlock_kernel();
}
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
}
di->i_ino = 0;
di->i_sblock = 0;
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 0);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
brelse(bh);
/* if this was the last file, make the previous
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
saves us 1 gap */
if (s->su_lf_eblk == inode->iu_eblock) {
s->su_lf_eblk = inode->iu_sblock - 1;
- mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh);
}
unlock_kernel();
clear_inode(inode);
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
static void bfs_write_super(struct super_block *s)
{
if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
- mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(s->su_sbh);
s->s_dirt = 0;
}
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@
iput(inode);
}
if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
- mark_buffer_dirty(bh, 1);
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
s->s_dirt = 1;
}
dump_imap("read_super", s);
--
Regards,
Rasmus([EMAIL PROTECTED])
That lowdown scoundrel deserves to be kicked to death by a jackass, and
I'm just the one to do it. -A congressional candidate in Texas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
