So make noise. I tried a post at /. but it wasn't accepted. We have power in our [tiny] voices when used enmasse. -d Graham Murray wrote: > David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this. > > What is the best way to handle sites which block connections using > ECN? Is it best for everyone who detects this to write individually to > each site which they find can be accessed with "echo 0 > > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn" but not (in the default state) of tcp_ecn > = 1? Or is there some better way to spread the word more "officially"? > > So far I have written to every site which I have been unable to > access with ECN enabled, but the only response (apart from > auto-responders acknowledging the receipt of the email) I have had has > said that the matter has been forwarded to the site's IT department. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg"> adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Blue Labs Developer x-mozilla-cpt:;28256 fn:David Ford end:vcard
