> I see the point, but it bites sufficiently often that I don't > understand why there is no interesting in improving this > behaviour. For a large number of scenarios it makes vastly more sense. > With both interfaces up, it's impossible to apply anti-martian > rules to the interfaces, since it's hard to predict which card > will answer an ARP request. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/.../hidden - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility David Luyer
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility Andrey Savochkin
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibili... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompati... bert hubert
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompati... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP inco... Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP ... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP inco... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP ... David Luyer
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility Rogier Wolff
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux 2.2 - BSD/OS 4.1 ARP incompatibility David Luyer