Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> But I'd much rather just have the "n+1" thing. The overhead is basically
> nonexistent, and it simplifies so many things.

I see no big problems with this either.  The only tricky thing is to
get the stack swapped after the first clone() but this is solvable.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to