Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I'd much rather just have the "n+1" thing. The overhead is basically > nonexistent, and it simplifies so many things. I see no big problems with this either. The only tricky thing is to get the stack swapped after the first clone() but this is solvable. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: thread group comments Linus Torvalds
- Re: thread group comments Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: thread group comments Alexander Viro
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper
- Re: thread group comments Alan Cox
- Re: thread group comments Brian Wellington
- Re: thread group comments Alan Cox
- Re: thread group comments Andi Kleen
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper
- Re: thread group comments Linus Torvalds
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper
- Re: thread group comments Linus Torvalds
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper
- Re: thread group comments Andi Kleen
- Re: thread group comments Linus Torvalds
- Re: thread group comments Andi Kleen
- Re: thread group comments Linus Torvalds
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper
- Re: thread group comments Andi Kleen
- Re: thread group comments Andi Kleen
- Re: thread group comments Ulrich Drepper