> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 03:15:27PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > So what do you propose to use when a long long division is needed (after > > much thought and considering all alternatives etc.etc.) ? > > Link against libgcc, what else? As also does anyone who does solaris drivers (x86 or sparc) using gcc- the code that gcc emits that requires 64 bit operations is quite nicely available in libgcc.a. Only a minor bit of hackage with gcc -v is needed in a makefile to emit the correct path for the linker to use. That is, unless somebody wants to write the support functions (specific to gcc, ah, but which one?) into the linux kernel? Oh dear, I don't think so.. -matt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- RE: Large File support and bl... Linda Walsh
- Re: Large File support and bl... Alan Cox
- Re: Large File support and bl... Rik van Riel
- Re: Large File support and bl... Alan Cox
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and bl... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Large File support and bl... Rik van Riel
- Re: Large File support and bl... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Large File support and bl... Alan Cox
- Re: Large File support and bl... Richard Henderson
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Large File support and bl... Michael Meissner
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Large File support and bl... Michael Meissner
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Large File support and bl... Richard Henderson
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Richard B. Johnson
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Linda Walsh
- RE: Large File support and blocks... Mark Hahn
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Stephen C. Tweedie
- 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File support and ... Daniel Phillips