On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:09:23AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: > Perhaps an "easy" way to go would be to convert block numbers to > type "block_nr_t", then one could measure the difference that 10's of > nanoseconds make against seeks and reads of disk data. That's not the issue. The issue is that the type creeps through the entire rest of the VFS and page cache. Once the page cache is affected, we're no longer talking about seeks and disk reads. In any case, I'm not defending the decision, but reporting previous discussion. Anyway, it's not like I'd care -- I've got Alphas. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Linda Walsh
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Matthew Jacob
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Linda Walsh
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Richard Henderson
- RE: Large File support and blocks... Linda Walsh
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and bl... Stephen C. Tweedie
- RE: Large File support and bl... Marco Colombo
- Re: Large File support and bl... Richard Henderson
- Re: Large File support and bl... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Large File support and blocks... Andi Kleen
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and bl... Andi Kleen
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Large File support and bl... Richard B. Johnson
- RE: Large File support and bl... Linda Walsh
- Re: Large File support and bl... Alan Cox
- Re: Large File support and bl... Rik van Riel
- Re: Large File support and bl... Alan Cox