On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:23:43PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Your patch does not seem correct to me. IMO you should rather be
> calling nlm_release_file() in both cases where you applied
> 'put_file()'.
No. In the first of two cases, lockd will call nlm_release_file()
on its own when the function returns. In the second case, we're being
called from inside nlm_traverse_files(), which holds a lock on the file
table -- nlm_release_file() would wait forever.
--
Michael "Tired" Riepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
