Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

[Chris Ricker]

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Keith Owens wrote:

> Before Rusty tells me that not everybody uses modules,
> /lib/modules/<version> can exist even if the kernel has no modules, it
> just needs a simple Makefile change.  Think of /lib/modules/<version>
> as a standard place to store information about kernel <version>.

I like the idea of a standardized repository in /lib matching the kernel.  
But if it's going to do more than modules, why not rename it something more
appropriate, like /lib/kernel/<version> or /lib/linux/<version> or even
(less preferably) /lib/<version>?

later,
chris

-- 
Chris Ricker                                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                              [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/