On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 7:06 PM Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:49:52PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
... > > diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c > > index edf2f4140eaa..981ddb20f48e 100644 > > --- a/security/lsm_init.c > > +++ b/security/lsm_init.c > > @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ static __initdata const char *lsm_order_cmdline; > > static __initdata const char *lsm_order_legacy; > > > > /* Ordered list of LSMs to initialize. */ > > -static __initdata struct lsm_info *lsm_order[MAX_LSM_COUNT + 1]; > > static __initdata struct lsm_info *lsm_exclusive; > > +static __initdata struct lsm_info *lsm_order[MAX_LSM_COUNT + 1]; > > I don't care either way, but why re-order these? Just local reverse > xmas-tree? Sure? Honestly can't say for certain, at this point in the development process I had somewhat resigned myself to having a mess of a patchset so I figured this was an opportunity to make it look "nice" (er?) in my mind, and I suppose at that point that looked better to me ... ? -- paul-moore.com
