On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 03:46:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:09:38PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > Stefano Garzarella (4): > > x86/sev: add SVSM vTPM probe/send_command functions > > svsm: add header with SVSM_VTPM_CMD helpers > > tpm: add SNP SVSM vTPM driver > > x86/sev: register tpm-svsm platform device > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 9 +++ > > include/linux/tpm_svsm.h | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig | 10 +++ > > drivers/char/tpm/Makefile | 1 + > > 6 files changed, 364 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 include/linux/tpm_svsm.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_svsm.c > > Jarrko, > > should I take the whole bunch through the tip tree? > > No point in splitting between two trees...
It's cleanly separated and does not even touch any shared headers, so I don't see any issues on doing that. I.e., I'm with it :-) > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette > BR, Jarkko
