On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > I can do that, I slightly prefer BIT_ULL() macro, but I don't have a strong
> > opinion on my side.
> > @Borislav since you suggested it, WDYT?
>
> Either goes for me. Sorry for nitpicking that :-) The first comment
> stil applies.
Bit 8 is a lot better than 0x100.
Let's give a better example:
0x0000000008000000
or
BIT_ULL(27)
:-)
While I'm here: I'm guessing I'll route patches 1 and 4 through tip once
they're ready to go and give Jarkko an immutable branch he can base the other
two ontop.
Agreed?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
