On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 12:23:47PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/04/2024 12:18, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > I got only one patch, but if these are compatible, why do you need > > > second patch? Plus binding come before users. > > > > Right, the order of the patches needs to be reversed it seems. > > What is the second patch? Device is or is not compatible?
The other patch just adds an entry to of_tis_i2c_match[] in the driver, pretty unspectacular: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Unfortunately it was only cc'ed to TPM driver maintainers.
