On Tue, 01 Feb 2000, Dhiran Rajbhandari used an e-pen to say :
>RH 6.1 supports FAT32 easily but earlier version doesn't support FAT32.
>Even earlier version (Before 6.1) can not be installed with FAT32 partition.
>
>Rgds,
>Dhiren
Thats not really correct. I have been happily running FAT32 and RH 6.0
(and earlier 5.2) with this entry in my /etc/fstab
/dev/hda1 /c vfat defaults 0 0
Shourya
>
>At 05:49 PM 1/5/00 +0530, you wrote:
>>Hi,
>> A lot of my friends are facing a problem.
>>The windows partition was accessible when it was FAT16. On converting
>>it to FAT 32 Linux stopped accessing it ( RHL ). In fact it works fine on
>>a few systems
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>-Mahendra M
>>RV College of Engineering, Bangalore.
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
>>the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
>>to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
>>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
>the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
>to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
--
_______________________________________________________________
Shourya Sarcar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <Tel:91-033-4710477>
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Jadavpur University Calcutta, India 700 032
All the world's a stage..
And I am acting tonight
C - the difference : http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linux India Mailing List Archives are now available. Please search
the archive at http://lists.linux-india.org/ before posting your question
to avoid repetition and save bandwidth.
