>>>>> "Shanker" == Shanker R Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shanker> making good x.2 releases!:-) I would think the addition
Shanker> of Kerberos and 128 Bit Netscape makes it a must have
Yes, Kerberos is uber-elite. Blah, lynx/links are cool enough
:>
Shanker> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madhesh wara"
Shanker> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
>> As you know, RH 6.2 has been released. It claims several
>> benefits over RH6.1 such as:-
>> 2. Easy X-configuration. All the monitors capabilities are
>> auto detected.
Isn't that just what XFree86-4.0 does? Or is it really
RH-specific?
>> 3. fdisk integration.
???
Um, -any- decent distribution lets you run fdisk ... so I
really don't see how this is a big deal.They probably -just- realised
that the barebones linux (c)fdisk are a tad simpler/more powerful to
use than Disk Druid ... oh-well..
>> Is it worth upgrading to RH 6.2 from RH 6.1. Your comments
>> regarding RH 6.2 are most welcome
I probably shouldn't be saying this without looking at RH6.2,
but going by past experience, I'm fairly sure they're going up just
package version upgrades.Besides, if there was anything -fantastic-
about the hierarchy,structure or anything, we'd have had a major
ruckus about it.
Oh-well :>
Ravi.
--
Ravikant K.Rao | http://www.symonds.net/~ravi/
Primary Email : <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on the LIH mailing list see:
http://lists.linux-india.org/lists/LIH
