|
I'm not sure my opinion is worth more than anyone else, except I
_am_ one of the admins.
Diego: +1 for not sending your mail to the list. -1 for not CCing
the actual admins, and another one for talking for the community.
Ori: -1 for making this part of the thread public. If I may be so
bold as to make a suggestion, simply ignoring Diego's mail would
have been smarter.
Shay: As far as I know, Nevo does not have police complaints, nor
even unpublished verdicts. Even if a complaint was filed, it
wouldn't have shown up. Feel free to correct me in private.
Michael: +1 agree. I believe this list should judge people based
on their behavior on or in relation to this list
Omer: As far as I can tell, Diego didn't send the request to the
list (at least, I didn't get it on the list). It may well have
been unintentional, but I'm going to give him the benefit of the
doubt here. Also, please note that failing to prove a point is not
the same as proving the opposite point. You are free to believe
whatever you like, but that is still your belief, not established
facts.
Someone identifying as linux.il: -5 for failing to distinguish
between a SCSI cable and a differential SCSI cable. I'm really
disappointed. From you, of all people, I expected better, whoever
you are.
On 04/05/2021 21:48, Ori Idan wrote:
Sorry, I am not a convicted criminal.
If you believe what is written in Yediot, that is your
problem.
--
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
Ori,
You are not welcome here. Please
unsubscribe.
Admins - please remove this convicted
criminal from this list. This man is a stain on our
community.
Note that Linux tries to use available memory for
cache, that is why free memory seems small.
--
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
Omer, thank you!
Is it related to the "Inactive" count
from /proc/meminfo?
I used to think that
available=free+cache+buffers...
From man free:
available
Estimation of how much memory is
available for starting
new applications, without swapping. Unlike the
data provided by
the cache or free fields, this
field takes into account
page cache and also that not all reclaimable
memory slabs will
be reclaimed due to items being in
use (MemAvailable in
/proc/meminfo, available on kernels 3.14,
emulated on kernels
2.6.27+, otherwise the same as free)
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 13:07 +0300, linux.il wrote:
> "Available" output seems weird, or I'm
missing something?
> Any ideas?
>
> TIA, Vitaly
>
> free -m
> total used free
shared buff/cache
> available
> Mem: 31654 29883 937
1 832
> 27675
> Swap: 0 0 0
--
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great
wealth was by
looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow
man. Capitalism made it
possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow
man." - Walter E.
Williams
My own blog is at https://tddpirate.zak.co.il/
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message,
are mine alone.
They do not represent the official policy of any
organization with
which I may be affiliated in any way.
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at https://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
|
