Thanks. That's the conclusion we reached too - VirtualBox would play nicely with KVM but not the other way around. i.e. it's possible to keep VirtualBox up all the time and insmod/rmmod kvm as needed, but we need it the other way around.
I think that using vagrant-kvm has the best potential for us. Cheers, --Amos On 7 March 2014 11:59, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+linux...@g.jct.ac.il> wrote: > Here's an article from last year that says the same: > http://swaeku.github.io/blog/2013/04/04/run-kvm-and-virtualbox-together/ > > And this suggests (like the articles do too to some extent) that boot > order may (have) matter(ed): > http://askubuntu.com/questions/413511/virtualbox-and-kvm-beside-each-other > > > 2014-03-07 1:39 GMT+02:00 Amos Shapira <amos.shap...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> Is it possible to run both KVM guests and VirtualBox guests on the same >> server AT THE SAME TIME? >> >> I'm asking because we use KVM to run multiple Bamboo CI Agents but also >> want to use the spare hardware capacity on the same iron's to run >> VirtualBox using Vagrant. >> >> Me and my colleagues are trawling the web and so far we found old "you >> can switch between them" articles (e.g. >> http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/kvm-virtualbox.html circa 2011), but >> I though I'll ask here since I know there are some members here who >> actually wrote this shit, and the products in this area move fast :). >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Amos >> >> -- >> [image: View my profile on LinkedIn] >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/gliderflyer> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-il mailing list >> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il >> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il >> >> > -- [image: View my profile on LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/gliderflyer>
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
