On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <h...@hetz.biz> wrote: > Shimi, 2013-c2 updates (available for centos 5.x/rhel 5.x) should be > sufficient too. > > I used the official timezone database naming convention ( http://www.iana.org/time-zones), not a specific distro.
And the official version where Israel's latest timezone got included, is 2013d, like I said. Source: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2013-July/000012.html I checked http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/tzdata-2013c-2.el5.x86_64.rpmand the file does have a timestamp of a couple of days after the above announcement (unfortunately, my zdump can't read it, so I can't tell for sure what's inside...) - and if you say you have checked and it shows Oct 27th as the day we move to IST... great. Why can't RedHat/CentOS call a file originating from upstream "2013d" by a name that suggests the origin version name (if that is indeed the case), like "2013-d" (if they must add extra dashes) - is beyond me. -- Shimi
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
