On 22 August 2010 15:27, Etzion Bar-Noy <eza...@tournament.org.il> wrote: > > I think OCFS2 is slightly better. > Listen - if you don't need clustered filesystem, avoid it at any cost. > However, if you do need it, then A/P cluster is not enough.
We are a little concerned about the situation of two guests mounting the ext3 and starting to manipulate the sqlite files on it in parallel. Another option was to allow all guests to mount the file system read/write but carefully configure each guest to "own" different files or directories of sqlite files on the FS. Otherwise, there is no reason for us to use a clustered file system. We ended up carving separate LUN's and separate Clustered LVM LV's (Logical Volumes) and mounting/unmounting them from the relevant guests and the processes get migrated among them through RHCS. Cheers, --Amos _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
