On Wednesday 16 Jun 2010 22:40:42 Diego Iastrubni wrote: > On יום רביעי 16 יוני 2010 13:47:35 Shlomi Fish wrote: > > > To make a good comparison, please to boostrap clang properly (you need > > > at least stage2, in theory from that point all binaries should be > > > identical). Building clang here does take about an hour or two, yes, > > > builind a C++ compiler is a long compilation. > > > > Indeed. > > > > In any case, I don't suppose the benchmark results of fc-solve itself > > will be different, because the output of the compiler should be the same > > in both cases, right? > > The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no > difference between theory and practice.
And in practice there is. :-) > > -> please test and continue every several days, as clang evolves in HUGE > steps very fast. I can still remember a few weeks ago when the compiler > self hoseted for me for the first time. In theory I can do that. In practice, I also need to make some actual progress with my projects. Maybe I'll test clang again in another month. > > Just for reference, how can I do those test myself? Where is your SVN > (git?) for me to test new code? See: http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fc-solve/trunk/ I'm still using svn. See the *.txt files under ./fc-solve/source/ . Let me know if there's anything else that you need. Regards, Shlomi Fish -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/ Best Introductory Programming Language - http://shlom.in/intro-lang God considered inflicting XSLT as the tenth plague of Egypt, but then decided against it because he thought it would be too evil. Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply . _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
