On Sunday 24 May 2009 14:55:43 Ehud Karni wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009 02:01:43 Omer Zak wrote:
> > What search tool would you recommend for use today?
> >
> > My tradeoffs:
> > - Ability to retrieve all results of a search, rather than say the 100
> > most recent ones.
> > - Plenty of hard disk space, so it need not be economized.
> > - After initial indexing, the daemon (or whatever) for handling new
> > material should not load the PC too much.
>
> What's wrong with `locate' (beside it is not being updated during the
> day ?). You can wrap it any way you want, it has regular expression
> search, and it is fast. I use it both in work (over 3.5M files in 69K
> directories) and at home (~900K files) and it works fine.
A few problems with locate:
1. It doesn't do full-text search, and just searches according to the
filename. You can perform text search on its results using "xargs grep",
"xargs ack" or a similar tool, but this is slower than indexing. And if you
don't know the filename - you'll need to search through a lot of files.
2. It doesn't handle compressed or otherwise encoded filenames properly. It
isn't content-type sensitive.
----------------------
Beagle and its friends are better in those regards. I should note that I'm not
using Beagle or whatever, because I didn't really find a need for them, and
because someone told me he once used a similar program for MS-Windows and as a
result became disorganised and could not find his files afterwards.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
Understand what Open Source is - http://xrl.us/bjn82
God gave us two eyes and ten fingers so we will type five times as much as we
read.
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
