On 10/03/2009, at 21:33, Oren Held wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:50:18 Herouth Maoz wrote:
Quoting Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com>:
www 3600 IN CNAME s5.hostlocal.com
szabgab.com 3600 IN CNAME s5.hostlocal.com
@ 3600 IN MX 10 s6.hostlocal.com.
Is that how it should be? With the trailing . on the MS record ?
dig @ns44.domaincontrol.com szabgab.com MX
does not seem to show me any MX record
Well, I'm not exactly an expert, but your MX record certainly isn't
propagated - I think the above definition must be wrong. Why does it
say "@" where it's supposed to say mail.szabgab.com?
Wrong, instead of the "@" should be szabgab.com and not
mail.szabgab.com -
because he wants u...@szabgab.com mail addresses.
Ah, right, I guess. The following confused me:
I'd like to have www.szabgab.com and szabgab.com to resolve to
s5.hostlocal.com while
mail.szabgab.com to resolve to s6.hostlocal.com and that all mail
sent to
@szabgab.com should be processed by s6.hostlocal.com
So actually there is no need to define mail.szabgab.com at all -
unless he wants to make it a cname for some protocol other than SMTP.
Herouth
_______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
