On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:55:47PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > >> Here is the situation as I see it: >> Reply to all: You respect each individual's preferences regarding how >> many copies they want to receive. >> Reply: You want to send a private reply, only to the sender (impossible >> when the list has "reply to list") >> And the non-standard buttons >> Reply to sender: Only makes sense in order to override lists with the >> broken "reply to list" header. >> Reply to list: You force people like me to get only one copy against my >> wish, and you are proud of it. > > The problem with that is not everyone uses complicated mailers. I am using > MUTT on a Linux system (this is a Linux list after) all, which is the same > mailer, with "improvements" that I have been using since 1991 when I got > my domain name and found out that UNIX mail would only put UUCP return > paths. > > I only have two choices, "reply to sender" and "reply to everyone" which > replies to everyone in the sender and CC headers. I think it is smart > enough not to reply twice to someone who is in both, but that's as far as > it goes.
Actually mutt has had support for reply-to-list for quite some time (before just about any other mailer?) If you're "subscribed" to the list, then shift-l is reply-to-list. -- Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's tzaf...@cohens.org.il | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
