2009/1/29 Shachar Shemesh <shac...@shemesh.biz>: > Herouth Maoz wrote: >> >> I prefer it over using "reply to all" because I can then easily scan my >> outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list. > > But I prefer you didn't. > > Mails arriving from the list go into the linux-il folder. Emails sent > directly to me are left in my inbox. I read my inbox much more frequently > than I read this folder. If you only reply to the list, I won't get your > reply to my email nearly as fast as if you hit "reply to all", slowing the > entire discussion down.
(First time doing "reply all" without culling duplicate recipients :) First - I agree with your reasoning. I get around to read my mailing list folders much less than my inbox. Somehow GMail seems to be able to do that - When I take part in, or start, a mailing list thread which is filtered to another "folder" (tagged with mailing list tag using a GMail filter) GMail will start showing this thread *also* in my inbox. I think it has something to do with It happens to me with CentOS mailman lists, for instance, but also with many other mailman lists. Maybe you can figure out how it does that and replicate it Anyway - thanks for brining this mailing list to current standards. --Amos _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
