On Jan 17, 2008 3:53 PM, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oren Held wrote:
>
>
> > B. I can't see why disabling the swap would help to AVOID oomkiller? Swap
> > should ENLARGE the available memory space; disabling swap might cause
> > triggering oomkiller more frequently. Maybe I misunderstood what you meant.
> >
> The memory I suspect the system is running out of is the memory
> allocated for the Kernel's use. It is labeled "Low memory" under
> /proc/meminfo. Here is the strange part - the more memory the system
> has, the more memory the kernel needs in order to keep track of it all.
> On the other hand, the amount of memory the kernel actually has does not
> change when you increase the amount of memory.
>
> Disabling the swap was my attempt to decrease the amount of overall
> memory the system has, and thus decrease the memory management memory
> requirement.
>
> As for A, when it is not application memory that the system is out of,
> but kernel memory, oom-killer is, for all intent and purposes, killing
> processes at random.
> >  - Oren
> >
> Shachar
>

this was discussed some time ago in  RH maillist
http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/RedHat/2007-08/msg00121.html
I hope it will be useful.

Vitaly

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to