Ira Abramov wrote: > Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Sat, 01 Dec: >> Hi, >> >> I just saw a link for this on the CentOS mailing list and though it >> might interest people here. >> >> http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm > > indeed, my jaw dropped. I had no idea ReiserFS was so far behind EXT3 > :-( > > time to reconsidder XFS I guess? I never used it before. Is is better at > recovering from crashes than ext3? journaling and all, I had it > sometimes come up in a bad, barely recoverable state after a crash. >
>From past experience with it (a couple of years ago), XFS uses an aggressive caching scheme which led (in my case) to data loss and need for repair after crashing. Since then I've used ext3, so no idea if things changed (for better or worse). Cheers -- Meir Kriheli ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
