Well, this is the greatness of GPL that it demands publishing your source code.
-- Ori Idan On Nov 7, 2007 9:36 AM, Michael Sternberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that GPL is great and know that GPL applications can be > commercial. The problem is that it demands to publish your application's > source code which is not acceptable in most commercial applications. > > But yes, as gettext site says it: libintl and libasprintf libraries are > LGPL, executables and libgettextpo library are GPL. > > It looks that if we will use libintl as DLL - we're OK, as it stated here: > http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Discussions > > Am I right ? > > > Sent: WednesdaDy, 07 November, 2007 08:46 AM > > > > I am not sure but I think the gettext library is LGPL, only the tools > > are GPL. > > > > If it is GPL, I am happy, this shows the greatness of GPL, it forces > > free software. > > > > Keep in mind that GPL application does not mean free (as in free beer) > > application. GPL application can be commercial. > > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ספרים וסיפורים שכתבתי: http://www.thestories.org
