On 08/08/07, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no idea why you think so - on the contrary, minimizing the number
I now see that, unlike my previous camera circa 2003, the EOS 350D supports USB 2.0 (or at least it can connect to a USB 2.0 bus, many devices still run at 1.1 speed but I don't know about the EOS 350D). Still, connecting the camera to the PC means that it is left on for the duration of the transfer, which I prefer not to do. of human actions and hence time spent with the camera on seems to me to > save on batteries. Also - transfer speed has nothing to do with it, I don't turn the camera on to take the memory card out of it and put it back in, so battery time IS saved. Digikam has several export methods, including the ability to generate > HTML files for upload to website (or directly to your web folder if you That's the method I used until I switched to Gallery 2 for this. It was OK for my needs (showing off selected photos to remote family and friends from my home computer) but it also meant that every time I had to export all the images to generate the HTML files, I couldn't control access to the web site, and generally it was a relatively limited interface. host your web site locally). I use Gallery2 as well, on a remote server, > and Digikam offers an "export to remote gallery" feature that allows me > to easily upload images to Gallery2. True. I just host my Gallery2 on my desktop together with Digikam so it can access the images directly. --Amos
