On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 05:15:35PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > You fail to mention whether they retained the copyright to their > contributions or assigned them to someone else (presumably, whoever > relicensed the code). If it's the latter, tough luck.
Actually the license states: ... retains copyright to all of the xxxxx system, and therefore can grant, at its sole discretion, the ability for ..... to create proprietary or Open Source (but non-GPL'd) modules which may be dynamically linked at runtime with the portions of ...... That limits the rights they retained. If they had addtionally retained the rights to grant non GPL licenses to the system itself, then they could, but they specificaly did not. They also in other places rant on about how much they love and support the GPL, and their product will remain GPL, and so on. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
