On 2/17/07, Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it a requirement that it be "Access", or should it be "a database
server"?

It has to be Access - it's not only a database, but a whole program
written in Access, with at least 50 forms, at least 100 queries and
lots of VB code.  I wrote it myself.  A few users in the office can
use it simultaneously, they can update tables, and Access locks and
unlocks records and tables automatically.  If a table is locked by one
user and another user tries to open it, he is denied.  There is also a
database of tables with many connections, this is in Access and in
general it can be any database, but we are happy with access and we
don't want to convert.  But if we do decide to convert, we will
convert only the tables (there are at least 50 of them) and not the
entire program.

It's very convenient for us that a few people can use the Access
program simultaneously, and we don't want to lose this feature.  But
as I said, the server will also be used for other purposes, such as a
mail server.

Access requires Windows, and that's one of the reasons we can't
convert the entire office to Linux.  Each user has Microsoft Access
installed on his computer.  It's smart on Microsoft side - we pay lots
of money to Microsoft.  Windows and Microsoft Office for each computer
in the office.  In theory I would like to convert the entire office to
Linux, but in reality I don't see how it will work.

I also think most people, who are not computer programmers, prefer
Windows.  If they just use the computer for typing Word documents or
using E-mail, Windows is usually easier to use or at least that's what
they're used to.  How many companies do you know, which are not
computer companies, who use Linux?

Uri.

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to