Once you installed it, it really doesn't matter if somebody later breaks
to Effie's site (to Effie it would matter :'( ). If you haven't
installed it yet - you can download it, and examine the file contets (an
XPI file is just a fancy extension to a ZIP archive) before installing
it (from the local file, of course).  I would do it even if the file
were signed, and even if it came by a stork directly from mozdev :-) .


Amos Shapira wrote, On 07/12/06 23:28:

> On 08/12/06, *Oded Arbel* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 18:38 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
>     > While I agree this is risky, I must correct your assumption that the
>     > fact this extension claims to deal with a banking site makes it more
>     > or less likely to be spyware. 
>
>
> I think the main issue is that it's unsigned - it means that a cracker
> who breaks into Effie's web site and installs a modified version won't
> be caught by the extension singing mechanism.
> I might be naive, but I pretty much trust Effie himself not to do any
> monkey business with his own extensions.
-- 
Dr. Zvi Har'El      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]    Department of Mathematics
tel:+972-54-4227607 icq:179294841    Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
fax:+972-4-8293388  http://www.math.technion.ac.il/~rl/    Haifa 32000, ISRAEL
"If you can't say somethin' nice, don't say nothin' at all." -- Thumper (1942)

Reply via email to