On 08/12/06, Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 18:38 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > While I agree this is risky, I must correct your assumption that the > fact this extension claims to deal with a banking site makes it more > or less likely to be spyware.
I think the main issue is that it's unsigned - it means that a cracker who breaks into Effie's web site and installs a modified version won't be caught by the extension singing mechanism. I might be naive, but I pretty much trust Effie himself not to do any monkey business with his own extensions. --Amos The Devil's avocado
