Hi,
I can easily update all of my software with the latest security updates.

Well , if I am not wrong this is only specific to Debian. (BTW : I don't know Debian :
I want to take advantage of this opportunity and ask : does
only non-stable Debian have this feature or also the stable Debian?)


And I assume it is  possible to install in Debian a program not by using
that util ? (like running ./config and make and make install)?
(So this DEbian util does not cover all )

I am using RH and Fedora; there is up2date util , but it does not cover everything
(since there are sw packages which comes with an installer of their own,etc).


Windows of course does not have such a util; there is LiveUpdate and Microsoft WindowUpdate and
service packs; However, if you take other linux distros linux into account , you can't tell that this is really
an advantage (unless there are some more distros which have this feature - I don't know of such).



Regards, Dan Kaspi







From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-il@linux.org.il
Subject: Re: Moving to Linux
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 16:42:30 +0300

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 04:20:22PM +0300, Josh Zlatin-Amishav wrote:
> On Sun, 8 May 2005, Dan Kaspi wrote:

> > When listing the main advantages of Linux , the most important one
> >I had thought of was security ; when you access the internet from a Linux
> >machine, chances that you get a virus or spyware or someone will intrude
> >your machine are smaller ; He answered that , when thinking in the long
> >term (2-3 years) , as more people will use linux as a desktop,
> >this can be easiy changed; moreover, he claimed that since Linux is an
> >open source,
> >maybe it is even easier to develop viruses/spyware to it. In this point
> >I did not know what to answer him. I am not a
> >security expert; it could be that he is right in this point.
>
> Hi Dan,
> Your friend is correct, it may be in fact easier to develop malware for
> OSS. Yet the same problem (access to the source code) makes it harder to
> hide "bad" code.


But also gives incentives to vendors to fix problems and not hide them.
So far this has worked very well.

(Naturally, being free software is not a magic bullet or anything)

>  You are also not dependant on one source to provide fixes
> to the problematic code.

Actually: I get all of my software from Debian. I get all of my fixes
from Debian. On windows I see people with software from multiple
vendors. Even free software on windows isn't usially custumized by a
ditributor like in Linux.

I can easily update all of my software with the latest security updates.
Can you say the same about any non-free installation?

--
Tzafrir Cohen         | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                           | a Mutt's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |                           |  best
ICQ# 16849755         |                           | friend

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/



================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to