On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:04:29AM +0200, guy keren wrote:
> > A. there is no "BSD SunOS". there is "BSD", and there is "SunOS". i assume
> > you're refering to SunOS
>
> No need to be harsh.

i think you're confusing 'harsh' and 'precise'.

> SunOS 4 was based on BSD, and SunOS 5+, aka

SunOS 5 is marketoidish - an after-thought. there is SunOS, and there is
Solaris. all the other names were created by marketing people as an
after-thought, in order to blurr the fact that sun is replacing a stable
operating-system by an incompatible and unstable operating system (i'm
talking about solaris 2.1, 2.2, not about current solaris versions).

> Solaris 2+, is basedon SysV. And I am pretty sure you know this.
> I find it very reasonable and expressive to say "BSD SunOS" as a short.

while i find it confusing - only people who know the history of sun from
around a decade ago, will understand that this does not refer to a new
dialect of BSD (and despire the fact that SunOS was based on BSD, and was
source-level compatible with BSD to the kernel level, it's not BSD as you
an i know it ;)   ).

-- 
guy

"For world domination - press 1,
 or dial 0, and please hold, for the creator." -- nob o. dy

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to