Eli,

I do not mean to start an argument or something but by my personal experience, my AMD 2600 on GA-7vm400 Pro2 with 512 Micron cl2 beats P4 3.0 anyday. And I am not talking about benchmarks, I am talking about overall user experience and mostly gaming (nvidia 5900xt).

If you mean benchmarking, then you are correct, of course :-)

P.S. I work for a medium sized computer store network and have built and optimized a lot of different systems.

Alon.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Eli Kara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: amd and intel



On Sunday 12 December 2004 18:34, GW wrote:
> AMD Athlon 2600 - 2800

I am not talking about just Mhz, I am talking performance wise.

Alon.

Alon,

You'd better check that again. With a properly configured system (that is
proper memory modules and bus speeds) and optimized applications (mainly
games benefit from this kind of optimizations), the P4 3GHz is way ahead of
the Athlon 3000+ (even the 3200+). The margin in other types of applications
is too small to make a difference for the user anyway.


Nope, AMD Opterons are the CPUs that can beat the P4 3GHz and better.

Regards,

--
Eli Kara
Beyond Security Ltd.

http://www.beyondsecurity.com/
http://www.securiteam.com/

The First Integrated Network and Web Application Vulnerability Scanner:
http://www.beyondsecurity.com/webscan-wp.pdf

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to