Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Wed, 10 Nov:

I'm sorry, the case I know is exactly the reverse. The person did click the EULA, and the judge said that "if it looks like a sell, money exchanges hands as if it's a sell, it's stocked like merchandise, then it's a sell, not a contract". It appears that, at the very least, the case is not as open and shut as you make it sound.

like I said, IANAL, but a sell IS a contract by the Israeli law, and based on that I'd assume it's the same in most of the western world.

IANAL at all but a sell must be a special case of a contract: the *buyer* doesn't sign anything, so he can't be bound by anything except transferring his money, which he immediately does. Any other obligation in the contract can only come from common practice or consumer-protection law. AFAIK, Israel doesn't yet have any seller-protection laws (ones that places obligations on the buyer).

--
"Not just a none, but the None.  The definate article.
The alpha and omega, unchanging and unwilling to act."
--- Chris Cioffi against PEP 336 (Make None Callable) on c.l.python.

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to